![]() ![]() The keyword search warrant “is profoundly different from traditional search warrants seeking data belonging to a suspect,” the defense argued in a court filing. Google said that it was “important” that the court recognized the “significant privacy and First Amendment interests implicated by keyword searches,” and noted that it has “a rigorous process designed to protect the privacy of our users while supporting the important work of law enforcement.”Ī representative for Seymour didn’t respond to a request for comment. The Denver District Attorney’s office said it was “very pleased” with the ruling and would move forward with its cases. “Because, why not? It’s a tantalizingly easy shortcut to generating a list of potential suspects.” “After today’s decision, I anticipate that reverse-keyword warrants will swiftly become the investigative tool of first resort,” she wrote in a dissent that was joined by Justice Carlos Samour. ![]() In a fiery dissent, Justice Monica Márquez wrote that the ruling “gives constitutional cover to law enforcement seeking unprecedented access to the private lives of individuals not just in Colorado, but across the globe.” “If dystopian problems emerge, as some fear, the courts stand ready to hear argument regarding how we should rein in law enforcement’s use of rapidly advancing technology.” “Our finding of good faith today neither condones nor condemns all such warrants in the future,” the court wrote. Still, it stressed that the findings were specific to the facts of the case, and it refrained from weighing in about the use of Google’s search data more broadly. In its 74-page decision, the court found that law enforcement had acted in good faith when it obtained the warrant for the teen’s search history. His motion is the first known challenge to the constitutionality of keyword search warrants. Lawyers for one of the defendants, Gavin Seymour, who was found to have Googled the home’s address 14 times in the days before the fire, argued that the keyword warrant constituted an illegal search and that any evidence from it should be suppressed. After some initial objections, Google shared data that enabled detectives to zero in on five accounts, leading to the arrest of three teens. They asked Alphabet Inc.’s Google to provide information about people who searched for the address of the house that went up in flames, using a novel approach known as a keyword search warrant. "When drivers are protesting, of course, they're protesting the injustice, but a lot of them really have that fear like, what if I get in put in a situation like that, and now my whole livelihood is going to be at risk," adds Salas.(Bloomberg) - The Colorado Supreme Court ruled on Monday that evidence gleaned from a warrant for Google’s search data could be used in a murder case, sparking concerns the decision may encourage more police to embrace the controversial technique.Īfter a 2020 fire that killed five people in the Denver area, police were scrambling to identify suspects. "As far as the state of Colorado they have a lot of work to do in terms of their laws."Īlthough a boycott may do little to disrupt the supply system, truckers hope it helps dismantle laws that could threaten their freedom. "I think that we should certainly as a country relook at that case," says Salas. MORE: Millions sign petition asking for clemency for trucker sentenced to 110 years for deadly pileup ![]() As of this publication, more than four million signatures had been collected. "There’s a number of trucking companies that go through a strenuous process of selecting their drivers and then training those drivers, and at times even putting apprentices with those drivers, especially when they're young and new to the industry."Īn online petition asking for clemency in Aguilera's case is quickly approaching its goal of 4.5 million signatures. "It's not just about going and getting my CDL, and then I’m going to go buy a truck, and I'll drive for anybody and everybody," he says. He encourages people to seek reputable training schools and companies. The real long-term problem could be the sentencing discouraging potential truckers in an industry already short on drivers. ![]() Plus, some drivers may use the protest to snatch up boycotted routes and make extra holiday cash. "I personally have seen this many times don't foresee that happening in a way that it has a tremendous impact," says John Esparza, President and CEO of the Texas Trucking Association.Įsparza says the public may not feel much of an impact with a large chunk of local imports coming from Mexico. Houston man charged in deadly Colorado crashĭOWNLOAD THE FOX 26 NEWS APP FOR THE LATEST ALERTSĬould the Colorado boycott resulting from the sentencing have an effect in Texas or cripple a country already dealing with supply chain problems?. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |